So a normal way to say "Bob wants a burger" might be:
bobu-wa hanbaaga-ga hoshii
bob-TOPIC burger-NOMINATIVE is_wanted
as for Bob, a burger is wanted
[I'm only vaguely familiar with the standard conventions for grammatical glossing; feel free to edit that if you want.]
But wa
is really just the topic marker.
Technically, it doesn't actually explicitly establish the grammatical role of bobu
within the... hm, "predicate structure" of hoshii
.
Is it possible to actually explicitly connect bobu
to hoshii
like that?
(Neverminding the question of a context where it would sound natural.)
Maybe something like this?:
bobu-ni hanbaaga-ga hoshii
bob-DATIVE burger-NOMINATIVE is_wanted
a burger is wanted by Bob
(Or maybe with a different order like:
hanbaaga-ga bobu-ni hoshii
burger-NOMINATIVE bob-DATIVE is_wanted
if that sounds better. Not the main point.)
Or maybe another way of asking this question:
If someone told you:
hanbaaga-ga hoshii
burger-NOMINATIVE is_wanted
a burger is wanted (by him)
They're assuming you understand from context who the implicit "wanter" is.
But if it's actually not clear, and you have to ask:
"*Who* wants a burger?"
then how do you do that?
(In a complete sentence!
Of course pragmatically you would prolly just use a fragment like "dare?" or something,
but there must be an implied complete sentence,
right?)
I assume this would be wrong:
dare-wa hanbaaga-ga hoshii ka?
who-topic burger-NOMINATIVE is_wanted QUESTION
as for who, a burger is wanted?
So how about this?:
dare-ni hanbaaga-ga hoshii ka?
dare-DATIVE burger-NOMINATIVE is_wanted QUESTION
by who is a burger wanted?
(Or, again, flip the order:
hanbaaga-ga dare-ni hoshii ka?
burger-NOMINATIVE dare-DATIVE is_wanted QUESTION
a burger is wanted by who?
if that sounds better.)