10

What are auxiliary verbs in Japanese language? Which verbs are auxiliary and how to tell which are auxiliaries, and which are normal?

It looks like the word です is an auxiliary verb. But why? What tells us that it has this function in sentence?

Is the word ます an auxiliary?

I apologize for silly questions.

Eiríkr Útlendi
  • 37,445
  • 1
  • 72
  • 121
Richard
  • 341
  • 1
  • 2
  • 8
  • Related: https://japanese.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1858/isnt-a-tag-auxiliary-verbs-or-jyodoushi-necessary – Yuuichi Tam Dec 12 '18 at 10:56

2 Answers2

14

There are two different definitions of auxiliary verb.

Auxiliary verb as the translation of 助動詞

Words like ます, (ら)れる are generally taught as "part of conjugations/forms" in most Japanese-as-a-second-language textbooks, but they are categorized as 助動詞 in monolingual Japanese dictionaries and grammar books. This word class is usually translated as auxiliary verb (or just auxiliary). The list of 助動詞 is relatively small (see below), and you may already be familiar with most of them (as part of "forms"). Generally, 助動詞 is a mishmash of functional words that work by modifying the meaning of the preceding word. Most auxiliary verbs can conjugate, and multiple auxiliary verbs can be "stacked" to say complicated things like "negative-causative-passive". For example, 飲ませられない ("is not forced to drink") is a verb 飲む followed by three auxiliary verbs (causative させる, passive られる and negative ない). Despite its name, a 助動詞 does not necessarily conjugate like a verb; for example, たい conjugates like an i-adjective.

List of Japanese 助動詞

  • (さ)せる for causation
  • (ら)れる for passive voice, ability, etc
  • ない・ぬ・ん for negation
  • (よ)う for volition
  • まい for negative inference
  • たい・たがる for desire
  • た/だ for past tense
  • ようだ for similarity
  • そうだ for hearsay
  • らしい for hearsay, behavior
  • だ・です for predication/politeness (aka copula)
  • ます for politeness
  • やがる for disdain
  • べし for requirement/certainty
  • ...Plus some rare archaic auxiliary verbs and dialectal forms. See this Wikipedia article (in Japanese) for the full list.

Auxiliary verb as the translation of 補助動詞

Words like (~て)いる, (~て)みる, (~て)おく are usually called subsidiary verbs (補助動詞), but some people like to call them auxiliary verbs. For details, please see: What is a subsidiary verb?


Regarding です/ます, yes, they are categorized as 助動詞 in Japanese monolingual dictionaries. But I think most beginner Japanese-as-a-second-language textbooks usually regard です as a (polite) copula and ます as a politeness marker.

If you are a beginner, you may be overwhelmed by the number of "forms" in Japanese verbs, but once you reach an intermediate level and start using learning materials written in Japanese, you may want to familiarize yourself with the concept of 助動詞. See also: Why Japanese verb has so many forms?

naruto
  • 313,860
  • 13
  • 324
  • 625
  • What about the verbs that you attach after the masu form (i.e. 続ける, 始める, etc.) What are they called? Jisho is calling them Auxiliary. – Simon Sep 16 '21 at 13:43
  • @Simon 続ける as in 食べ続ける is called a "(syntactical) compound verb". – naruto Feb 28 '23 at 02:27
2

Without knowing how far you are in your Japanese studies or linguistic studies, it's difficult to know how much detail to provide. But here are two key points to get you started - I suggest you search the site as there are many detailed posts relating to your questions.

です is a copula (in simple terms a copula is a verb which links the subject to an element in the predicate).

Auxiliary verbs have different forms in English and Japanese. In English, they are separate words which modify other words to produce specific functions. In Japanese, auxiliary verbs (助動詞) take the form of declinable words which attach to specific forms of other words. ます is an auxiliary which attaches to the continuative form (連用形) of verbs. For example, the continuative form of 書く is 書き. Now you can add the auxiliary ます to make 書きます.  

I have refrained from going into detail here as I believe there are many explanations of these concepts contained in other posts.

kandyman
  • 11,608
  • 17
  • 44
  • As an addendum, auxiliaries (助動詞【じょどうし】) in Japanese generally cannot stand on their own -- they function morphemically more like suffixes that attach to specific forms of verb stems. For instance, the copula だ・です can follow a noun, an adjective, reported speech, or various other things. By contrast, the auxiliary ます can only come after a verb stem, in this case specifically in the 連用形【れんようけい】 or continuative form. The negative auxiliary ぬ・ず can only come after a verb stem, in this case specifically in the 未然形【みぜんけい】 or irrealis / incomplete form. Auxiliaries must attach to a verb. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 12 '18 at 17:55
  • @EiríkrÚtlendi How about ある and ない? Can't they function as both auxiliaries and stand-alone verbs? – kandyman Dec 12 '18 at 18:00
  • ある is a standalone. Some uses of this verb are also classed as 補助動詞, which confusingly is sometimes also translated as "auxiliary verb" -- however, while this does compound with other verbs, it can exist on its own, and it is thus not a 助動詞, which cannot stand on its own. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 12 '18 at 20:40
  • ない is a funny one. From a modern perspective, this is classed as both a 1) standalone -i adjective, and 2) an auxiliary that suffixes the 未然形 stem of a verb. However, in both cases, it conjugates as a regular -i adjective, so I tend to view this as an adjective primarily, where the auxiliary use evolved from a kind of convergence, replacing the real auxiliary (where by "real", I mean "can never stand on its own") ぬ with the adjective ない. These two are probably related. The ない adjective happened before the ない verb suffix, which is actually a relatively recent development. ぬ is even older. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 12 '18 at 20:45
  • For ある I was thinking of structures like ~てある which seems to behave exactly like an auxiliary verb in that it modifies the meaning of the base verb while retaining its own proper conjugation. – kandyman Dec 12 '18 at 21:42
  • In that case, the て is the auxiliary, attaching to the 連用形 stem of the verb. The ある (or いる or おる) is still a standalone verb, not (necessarily) attaching to another verb's conjugated stem. This usage is the case described in Japanese as 補助動詞. See more here at the Japanese Wikipedia. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 12 '18 at 22:58
  • Perhaps this confusion is caused by the terminology. The article you linked refers to て as a conjunctive particle, such that the construction てある is formed by: verb continuative form + conjunctive particle て + subsidiary/auxiliary verb (補助動詞). In this case, it sounds a bit strange to call て the auxiliary since て is immutable. I'm getting the feeling that the English term 'auxiliary verb' is incomplete when it comes to describing the behavior of Japanese verbs. – kandyman Dec 12 '18 at 23:11
  • I realize I may have added to the terminological confusion regarding て, as my headspace may be too much in the archaic language, where て is regarded as the 未然形 and 連用形 conjugations of completion auxiliary つ. Anyway, regarding ある as a 補助動詞, I see now that the Meta discussion linked to from the comments to the original question describes 補助動詞 as "subsidiary verbs" rather than "auxiliaries"; perhaps that nomenclature might help? The main functional distinction still holds: 助動詞 must attach to a verb stem, while 補助動詞 can stand alone. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 13 '18 at 00:26
  • Example of 補助動詞 as a standalone: 「書いてあるの?」→「あるよ。」 As another indicator, 補助動詞 constructions allow particles between the main verb and the subsidiary: 「食べてばかりいる」、「読んでくれない」、等. Neither is possible with 助動詞. – Eiríkr Útlendi Dec 13 '18 at 00:33